Saturday, March 24, 2012

PHONY 2012


Joseph Kony is a bad guy. This much we know and can all agree.

The Ugandan war criminal, who runs the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), an organization known for kidnapping children, turning them into sex slaves and soldiers, is the subject of a viral film that has generated over 85 million views in less than three weeks. Jason Russell, the director of the film, KONY 2012, calls for immediate action and tells his audience "KONY MUST BE STOPPED." The 30-minute film was released on YouTube on March 5 and hundreds of people have voiced their support for the cause with tweets and shares.

The filmmaker's goal has been to raise awareness and have people worldwide know Joseph Kony by name... among other things.

Joseph Kony is currently number one on the International Criminal Court's most-wanted list, so again, there's no question about the fact that he is a criminal. The problem, however, comes on the part of Jason Russell himself and whether his film is meant to educate viewers and raise awareness or simply commercialize these conflicts.

KONY 2012 fails in addressing the fact that Kony and his band haven't been active in Uganda for years now. The LRA has moved onto other countries, but the film doesn't urge action outside of Uganda. The film instead portrays Ugandans as helpless victims at a time when Kony isn't their biggest concern.

The film also fails in educating its audience about the conflicts. Jason Russell, who interestingly enough was detained last week for masturbating in public in San Diego, uses his five-year-old son, Gavin, as means of simplifying these issues. In showing his son images of Kony, he points out that Kony is the "bad guy," whereas others, such as Jacob Acaye - a former child abductee from Uganda - is a "good guy." In effect, the filmmaker treats his audience as five-year-olds, oversimplifying these issues as if we, like his son, are uneducated about the world.

The film fails in educating its viewers about the conflict in Uganda and rather uses filmic techniques, such as rapid editing, to emotionally exhaust its viewers. The film repeatedly tells its audience that we must "stop at nothing" and takes us on an emotional roller coaster. In using an emotional narrative rather than an educational one, Jason Russell convinces his audience to donate to his efforts by having viewers purchase a $30 "action kit," which will go toward bringing Kony to justice. This itself becomes questionable; if a filmmaker wants to raise awareness through a documentary film, he wouldn't use an emotional narrative to persuade his viewers to donate money to him. The film, however, does just that; by the time the filmmaker asks you for $30, you're wiping away the tears in your eyes just to grab your wallet.

The backlash the film has received claims that a significant portion of the money donated to the project goes to travel expenses and filmmaking rather than efforts in helping find Kony. There have been several open letters to the filmmaker, asking where the donated money actually, but we'd assume the filmmaker has too busy masturbating in public to immediately have answers for us.

In addition, the timing of the film and its title, KONY 2012, is more concerned with commercial interests than anything else. In effect, the filmmaker commercializes the Ugandan conflict in which thousands of people have lost their lives. The title of the film itself speaks to the upcoming presidential elections, drawing attention to itself, as if he were selling us a product rather than making an educational film.

There's no question whether the subject of the film, Joseph Kony, deserves to be brought to justice. It's clear that he and his organization is responsible for thousands of deaths; what's questionable is how we use cinema and documentary films to bring attention to these conflicts and issues. In the case of one filmmaker, he feels the need to commercialize off these issues. In simplifying these conflicts and making Kony the clear "bad guy," he urges his audience to do the right thing and donate money to him, which he assures us will "stop Kony."

4 comments:

  1. I love the points you bring up in this post and the image "Phony 2012." I personally know someone who is deeply involved with Invisible Children and the Kony 2012 campaign and while I whole-heartedly believe that they believe they are making a difference, I am skeptical of what impact they are making and of Russell's intentions in general. Backlash towards the video including reports from Uganda natives that show the information in the video to be outdated and not 100% accurate make me question Russell's exact motives. As I focused on in a recent post, his recent detainment in San Diego left me questioning his mental stability. There is no doubt that Kony is a horrible person and justice is deserved but I question whether the action Invisible Children is calling out for is really for the best interest of the people of Uganda.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It seems that the only thing worse that an atrocity like the one that Joseph Kony has brought on Uganda is Jason Russell's profit from that atrocity. Doing a bit of research on my own brought up an interesting argument about how the success of this video was spurred on by "youthful idealism" and that the amount of views garnered by this video was driven mainly by people under 25. Jason Russell has found the formula that presidential candidates have been looking for, how to motivate young people from their computer screens. The article called it "slacktivism," activism from the armchair.
    While I do think that it was misguided for Russell to report with exaggeration on the situation in Uganda, I don't think that it is a bad thing that Russell made people care about anything at all. Another concern of mine comes after reading that many who originally pledged money called Invisible Children to get their money back. In this regard, Russell may have contributed negatively to activism of any sort. Making people fell duped out of their money only makes them hold on to it a little tighter the next time someone sticks their hand out.
    Lastly, I feel as though Jason Russell's personal life is being dragged in unnecessarily. America can't help but focus on his breakdown, rubbernecking is one of our favorite things to do, but when all is said and done, Russell did something and taught people about something they didn't know about. I'd say that's good work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you hit the nail right on the head. When I finished watching the video, I could only note how impressive the movie was in terms of cinematography and emotional draw. More than anything, Jason Russell was a good storyteller, and I completely agree he 'emotionally exhausted' his viewer by the end of the video. I think the video fooled audiences into thinking this was some sort of documentary when it's really just a story told through the perspective of one man. I'm really glad this video and campaign were questioned because it put light on the importance of critique and skepticism. But I'm also kind of disheartened by how quickly people dismissed the cause and campaign after the previous controversies.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think there's something to be said for advancing a cause like this, so I don't blame the filmmaker for producing this film in order to get more people on board; I also don't blame him for making strides to go as far as leaving his viewers "emotionally exhausted" in the name of getting them involved. My real issue with this whole matter is the seemingly feigned interest of many of the people who watched this video. It appears that many people want to care about Kony's actions, and they want their peers to think that they care, but they don't actually give a crap in the end. Everybody wants to be a humanitarian and to facilitate the end to human-rights violations like the ones Kony has committed, but you can only go so far by sharing a video and arguing fruitlessly about the topic on the internet. Sure, awareness is great, and the public reaction to the video was a major proponent in advancing the cause. That's why I commend Russell's apparently sincere effort to notify the public. But in the absence of tangible action, raising awareness can only take the anti-Kony campaign so far.

    ReplyDelete